Planning for our growing city

Our growth challenge

Our population is growing. Over the next 30 years it’s predicted we’ll need more than 40,000 new houses in Ōtautahi Christchurch to ensure everyone has a place to live. This means re-thinking some of our planning rules to allow more housing choice and provide greater opportunities for business development.

We need to provide for the growth of housing and commercial centres in the best locations, to help address issues such as climate change and housing affordability. This means more houses close to our growing commercial centres, where there’s good access to services, public transport networks and infrastructure. Living within easy reach of work, school and shops makes getting around easier and helps reduce transport emissions.

However, we also need to ensure development remains restricted in areas where there’s good reason, or limited where we need to protect and maintain areas of value.

Our proposed Housing and Business Choice Plan Change

Changes in our Housing and Business Choice Plan Change (Plan Change 14), which was publicly notified on 17 March 2023, are directed by government legislation.

There are new national standards for multi-housing developments called the Medium-Density Residential Standards (MDRS). The MDRS enables housing choice across Aotearoa New Zealand’s main urban areas. These standards support the development of three homes up to three storeys on each site, without the need for resource consent.

The National Policy Statement on Urban Development 2020 (NPS-UD) requires even greater building development than the MDRS – both residential and commercial – to be allowed within and around the central city, suburban commercial centres and planned high-frequency and high-capacity public transport. This is to enable more people to live near existing services, public transport networks and infrastructure. What we can influence is how much and where additional development should be enabled.

This proposed plan change creates a range of residential and commercial zones in Ōtautahi Christchurch, which will enable more development to happen at different heights, with the highest development enabled in the central city and suburban commercial centres.

The MDRS would’ve come into effect for most of Ōtautahi Christchurch from PC14’s notification date of 17 March 2023. However, it won’t come into effect until a final decision is made on the plan change in about March/April 2024. That’s because we’ve proposed a city-wide restriction, called a Qualifying Matter, to protect sunlight access for homes, which they would not get under the MDRS. Until the ‘Sunlight Access’ qualifying matter is decided on, as well as others we’re proposing, the MDRS can’t take effect.

Additionally, we’re proposing a mechanism to help maintain the city’s tree canopy cover on land that is subdivided. Financial contributions could be required from those developing land that do not keep existing trees or plant 20 per cent tree canopy cover on a site, and 15 per cent tree canopy over any new road. We also propose identifying protected trees listed in the current District Plan as a Qualifying Matter.

To speed up the opportunity to develop more housing, a new planning process, called the Intensification Streamlined Planning Process (ISPP), has been introduced by the Government. The public can submit on the proposed intensification rules, but following hearings, no appeals will be allowed. However, Judicial Review to the High Court remains possible.

Under the process, the Housing and Business Choice Plan Change and Heritage Plan Change must be completed within a fixed timeframe. While the Minister for the Environment has yet to formally confirm a new date after the delay of notification, we expect this will be in March/April 2024.

What we can influence

We need to accept:

• The Government’s direction around intensification, including the Medium-Density Residential Standards
• Timelines for notification and decision-making
• The level of technical information and minimum evidence needed
• The Intensified Streamlined Planning Process.

We can influence:

• The extent of some changes, such as building heights above the MDRS, or the geographic area of proposed new medium, high and mixed use zones
• To what extent a property or area should be either more, or less enabled for development through Policy 3 of the NPS-UD

• What effects the Council will consider when a resource consent is required – taking the technical evidence into account. Effects include matters such as overshadowing, privacy, dominance, design, safety, and access to services. 

What we’ve changed

On 8 September 2022, the Council voted not to notify a previous version of Plan Change 14. Since then, this alternative proposal has been drafted and, following approval from the Council on 1 March 2023, publicly notified.

The table below is a summary of changes and additions made to the 2022 version of the plan change. 

The proposed zones

The proposed plan change identifies residential and commercial zones where greater levels of development is enabled (densities and heights). In some zones, this will still be subject to resource consent where several matters must be considered, mostly in regard to site layout and building design.

Medium-Density Residential Zone

This zone is the baseline for increasing housing in our city. Rules for this zone are legally required by the Enabling Housing Act and must be applied to most residential areas of Ōtautahi Christchurch. This Act introduced the Medium-Density Residential Standards that will allow the development of up to three homes of up to 12 metres on a single property, without resource consent – if they comply with the specified standards.

While the MDRS will apply across all urban residential areas, we’re proposing to limit the extent of where such development would apply through Qualifying Matters. See section on qualifying matters for further information.

Subdividing

A subdivision of land that is currently vacant will need to have lots that are at least 400 metres2.
For a site that contains a house, there will be no minimum allotment size when subdividing around the existing house or a planned consented house.
A subdivision that includes existing or consented homes will not need any form of written approval from neighbouring properties, or notification of the intent to subdivide.

Building height and occupation of land

Buildings that could be constructed without a resource consent may:

• Be up to 12 metres high, with a recession plane taken from three metres above the property boundary and at an angle of between 50 and 60 degrees, depending on site orientation (see Sunlight Access Qualifying Matter).
• Be setback 1.5 metres from the front boundary and 1 metre from side and rear boundaries.
  Cover up to 50 per cent of the site.
• Have ground floor units with at least 20 metres2 of dedicated outdoor living space, or at least a combined eight metres2 on other floors, such as a balcony or roof terrace.
• Have at least 20 per cent of the site grassed or planted, and 20 per cent tree canopy cover either planted, retained, or payable as a financial contribution (see Financial Contribution section).
• Have at least 20 per cent of the street-facing façade glazed, or 17.5 per cent under specific conditions
• Be compliant with other new standards, including services, minimum unit size, habitable rooms, and updated fencing standards.

Proposed buildings that do not follow all these requirements will need a resource consent, which may need neighbours’ approval, but will not need to be publicly notified (for developments of three or fewer units).

Resource consent is needed when four or more units are constructed. However, no written approval from neighbouring properties or notification is needed for the construction of four or more units, when complying with the above rules.

The MDRS for this zone are legally required by government legislation. The Council can make MDRS more lenient or restrict standards further by identifying Qualifying Matters. Additional controls may also be added where they do not compromise the MDRS.

Precincts within the Medium-Density Residential Zone

We’re proposing that some areas of the city within the Medium-Density Residential Zone include precinct overlays.

Precincts may enable more or higher housing or may have a different minimum lot size in areas such as the Port Hills areas of Cashmere and lower Huntsbury (where the MDRS apply).

Indicative illustration: Medium-Density Residential Zone (MDRS)

High-Density Residential Zone

We propose concentrating this zone around our larger commercial centres, including the central city. We’re required to enable at least six storeys surrounding the walkable catchment of these centres, so we propose enabling heights of 20 metres within at least 1.2 kilometres of the central city and smaller walking catchments for other centres. In the central city, this would enable the construction of apartment buildings and multi-storey flats, with sites closest to the central city enabled to 32 metres, or about 10 storeys. Any high-density area further away from the central city would be limited to 20 metres.

Subdividing

• Vacant sites when subdivided must have allotments of at least 300 metres2.
• For a site that contains a house, there is no minimum allotment size when subdividing around the house or a planned house with a consent.
• Any subdivision that includes existing or consented homes does not need any form of written approval or notification from neighbouring properties.

Building height and occupation

Housing that could be constructed without a resource consent will:

• Be up to 14 metres in height, subject to a recession plane, with residential units being no less than two storeys in height.
• Take the recession plane from three metres above the boundary at an angle of between 50 and 60 degrees, depending on site orientation (Sunlight Access Qualifying Matter). Recession planes do not apply along the front of a site when constructing three or more dwellings (up to 14 metres in height), or where above 14 metres and setback at least six metres from side and rear boundaries.
• Be set back 1.5 metres from front boundaries and one metre from side and rear boundaries, with buildings above 12 metres required to be set back between six and eight metres, depending on orientation.
• Cover up to 50 per cent of the site, with the option of 60 per cent site coverage when specific conditions are met
• Have ground floor units with at least 20 metres2 of dedicated outdoor living, or at least a combined 8 metres2 on other floors, such as a balcony or roof terrace – with less needed for one-bed units.
• Have at least 20 per cent of the site grassed or planted, and 20 per cent tree canopy cover either planted, retained, or payable as a financial contribution (see Financial Contribution section).
• Have at least 20 per cent of the street-facing façade glazed, or 17.5 per cent under specific conditions.
• Be compliant with other new standards including services, minimum unit size, habitable rooms, and updated fencing standards.

Housing that does not meet one or more of these standards will need resource consent and may need written approval from neighbouring properties but will not be publicly notified (for developments of three or fewer units).

Resource consent is required when four or more housing units are constructed. However, no written approvals or notification is needed for the construction of four or more units when complying with the height and other standards above.

Housing of between 14 and 20 metres will be managed via resource consent, as follows:

• Housing that is up to 20 metres in height requires greater open space to be provided by recessing upper floors and increasing outdoor living space at the ground level. When evaluating a consent application, we will consider building dominance, privacy, shading, necessity of height, building modulation and building location relative to transport and amenities.
• Housing that is up to 32 metres in height will have the same controls as those up to 20 metres, but will also require these upper floors to be set back six metres from side boundaries and rear boundaries, and three metres from front boundaries. These form standards help reduce the effects from larger buildings. We will be able to consider the same matters as above when granting consent.
• Buildings exceeding 20 metres will also need to be evaluated for their effect on wind.

The increased height limit of 32 metres is proposed to be limited to only those areas immediately surrounding the central city. Other areas are proposed to be limited to 20 metres.

Indicative illustration: High-Density Residential Zone

Changes to Commercial Zones

The NPS-UD enables even greater building development than what is allowed under the MDRS within and around the central city and suburban commercial centres. It is important to note that while greater development is enabled, resource consent will still most likely be needed.

There is a hierarchy of commercial centres, based on the direction set in the NPS-UD and national planning standards, and we’re proposing different zones in and around these centres. The highest development – both residential and commercial – will be enabled in and around our biggest commercial centres, with this gradually reducing out to our smaller ‘Neighbourhood Centres’.

The proposed height of development enabled is based on access to services, public transport, walking and cycling networks, and infrastructure available in these commercial centres. It is important to note that the commercial centre boundaries are not changing, but the height of what can be built within and surrounding them is increasing.

Indicative illustration: Edge of Local Centre

Heights within and around commercial centres

The table below shows the different centres and building heights that we propose enabling within and around our commercial centres.

* For areas outside of the vacuum sewer wastewater system constraints only. Please see section below on Infrastructure for more.

** The Belfast Commercial Centre has been proposed as a Town Centre (enabling 20-metre commercial buildings) with the surrounds enabling 14-metre residential buildings.

Subdividing

Subdivision thresholds within commercial centres are not changing from what the current District Plan anticipates (250 metres2 for suburban commercial centres and no minimum lot size for the central city). Subdivision thresholds around commercial centres will vary in accordance with the relevant residential, industrial, or mixed-use zone provisions.

All subdivision applications (regardless of zone or allotment size) will trigger the need for resource consent.

City Centre Zone

Our city centre is where we want the most and highest development to occur, such as high-rise offices and residential apartment blocks.

The NPS-UD requires us to maximise development opportunities within the City Centre Zone. This includes everything currently zoned as Commercial Central City Business, which is loosely bordered by Madras, Tuam, Montreal and Kilmore streets, and either side of Victoria Street to Bealey Avenue.

Resource consent will still be needed to ensure that development is of a high quality but building heights up to 90 metres are anticipated. Lower height limits will apply around Whiti-reia Cathedral Square and Victoria Street to manage shading and building dominance on important public spaces and adjoining lower-rise residential neighbourhoods. Qualifying Matters apply to areas like New Regent Street and the Arts Centre where limiting heights will protect heritage values.

Subdividing

There is no proposed change from the current District Plan so we’re continuing to provide no minimum site size for subdivision in the Central City Zone.

Building heights and development

We propose adjusting building heights within the City Centre Zone. However, a resource consent will be needed for most developments within the central city to enable us to assess the effects of shading, wind, and urban design requirements. Some rules are changing to ensure that development in the City Centre is of a quality expected for our pre-eminent commercial centre.

Our adjusted height limit in the City Centre Zone is 90 metres except for:

• 45 metres – Victoria Street commercial area and sites around Whiti-reia Cathedral Square
• 28 metres – New Regent Street interface
• 16 metres – Arts Centre
• 8 metres – New Regent Street

Central City Mixed-Use, Commercial Mixed-Use and Industrial zones

We’re adjusting the requirements for new developments in some of the Central City Mixed-Use Zone and the Commercial Mixed-Use Zone. These are within the walkable catchments of commercial centres that the NPS-UD directs us to intensify further, to create a city with its highest buildings at its centre, gradually decreasing in height out to the suburbs.

The proposed amendments include:

• Enabling heights of up to 32 metres in the Central City Mixed-Use zones, except within the Southern Central City Mixed-Use (CCMU) Precinct, where 21 metres will be enabled.
• Adding provisions that support high-quality outcomes for residential development in the Mixed-Use zones.
• Re-zoning Industrial General-zoned land, within close proximity of the City Centre Zone (across Addington, Sydenham, and Phillipstown, south of Ferry Road), to Mixed-Use, and adding a Comprehensive Housing Precinct to the zone to enable high-density residential activity up to 20 metres in height, including a Development Plan to provide an indicative location of laneway connections in the precinct.
• Introducing a Brownfield Overlay in the Industrial General Zone for land close to suburban commercial centres, which enables medium-density residential development.

Subdividing

The minimum lot size for subdivision in the Mixed-Use Zone will remain at 250 metres squared, while the Central City Mixed-Use zones will stay at 500 metres squared.

Building heights and development

Within the Central City Commercial Mixed-Use Zone, permitted building heights will increase from 17 to 32 metres, to match the surrounding High-Density Zone. This will exclude the Southern CCMU Precinct, where 21 metres will be enabled. The building heights permitted in the Commercial Mixed-Use Zone will increase to 20 metres, to match surrounding areas. Rules to manage the effects of new buildings will be similar to the city centre. Proposed housing in the Central City Mixed-Use Zone and Commercial Mixed-Use zones will need to meet the residential development standards as set for the High-Density Residential Zone.  

Financial contributions

Changes to the Resource Management Act mean we’re now able to ask for Financial Contributions from anyone looking to develop land, even when a resource consent isn’t needed (as per the new direction of the Enabling Housing Act).

Financial Contributions differ from Development Contributions, which are charged through the resource consenting process to ensure anyone developing land pays a fair share of the cost of providing more infrastructure to their development.

Development Contributions are narrower in scope and are used to recover the costs for new assets or to increase the capacity of infrastructure. Financial Contributions can be collected to manage the direct impacts of a particular development. Councils can charge anyone developing land both Financial Contributions and Development Contributions but cannot recover more than the financial impact of the development.

We’re proposing that anyone wishing to develop land may need to pay Financial Contributions to help mitigate some of the negative effects caused to our city’s tree canopy. To avoid paying Financial Contributions those developing land must either plant at least 20 per cent tree-canopy cover on a site or retain existing trees. Any development creating new roads will need to ensure that at least 15 per cent of the road reserve has tree canopy.

Financial Contributions will be used by us to plant trees on Council-owned land.

Meeting the threshold

Strong evidence is required to apply a Qualifying Matter to reduce the level of development that may be otherwise provided for under MDRS or the NPS-UD.

A qualifying matter does not provide blanket protection from housing intensification, as even a low-density residential zone provides for some level of housing intensification.

Proposed Qualifying Matters

We propose that most of the District Plan’s current limitations on greater densities are kept, including those that manage outstanding landscapes, sites of ecological and cultural significance, heritage, significant utility and infrastructure overlays, and areas at risk from natural hazards.

Our proposed Qualifying Matters are:

• Matters of national importance (RMA s6):
  
  • Outstanding and Significant Natural Features
  • Areas of Significant Indigenous Vegetation
  • Sites of Wāhi Tapu (sites of cultural significance)
  • Silent Files; Ngā Tūranga Tūpuna (sites of cultural significance)
  • Ngā Wai (sites of cultural significance)
  • Slope Hazard Areas
  • High Flood Hazard Management Area
  • Historic Heritage and Heritage Areas (These are proposed as part of the Heritage Plan Change (Plan Change 13))
  • Waterbody setbacks
  • Coastal Inundation Areas
  • Coastal Erosion
  • Significant and Other Trees (excluding those not identified as Qualifying Matters)
• Public Open Space areas
• Residential Character Areas
• Electricity Transmission Corridors
• Airport Noise Contours
• Electricity Distribution Corridors
• Lyttelton Port Influence Overlay
• NZ Rail Network Interface Sites
• Radio Communication Pathways for the Justice and Emergency Services Precinct
• Vacuum Sewer Wastewater Constraint Areas
• Sunlight Access
• Low Public Transport Accessibility
• Industrial Interface
• Riccarton Bush Interface
• Tsunami Management Area
• Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor
• Fitzgerald Avenue Geotechnical Constraint [PPC11 site]
• Outline Development Plan Features
• Key Transport Corridors – City Spine

Infrastructure

Our drinking water, stormwater, wastewater and public transport systems will need to support our increased population and housing based on growth projections for the next 50 years. In some parts of the city our major pipes can’t accommodate increased growth.

Public transport accessibility restriction

We’re proposing to limit the extent of where the MDRS would be enabled to near the highest-frequency bus routes and routes that connect larger commercial centres. Broadly, this means that outer suburbs, such as Parklands, south Halswell, Casebrook, Lyttelton and most of the Port Hills, would be unable to progress with medium-density development – see below for an overview map.

This Qualifying Matter focuses intensification within and around commercial centres. This is to promote the use of public transport and reduce dependency on the use of private vehicles. The Qualifying Matter would not restrict any current Residential Medium-Density Areas or proposed High-Density Areas.

Map of areas where the MDRS would be restricted due to the Public Transport Accessibility Qualifying Matter.

Vacuum sewer wastewater constraint areas

We propose limiting development in Shirley, Aranui and Prestons due to wastewater system constraints. Vacuum-sewer wastewater systems were installed post-earthquake to cope better with liquefaction and land settlement. The system was designed for the housing intensification allowed at that time. Since then, the District Plan has allowed more intensification in the Shirley area than the vacuum-sewer system was designed for.

The vacuum-sewer pipes in Shirley and Aranui have reached capacity and Prestons is also constrained. This Qualifying Matter means most of the Shirley, Aranui, and Prestons area, can only be developed like-for-like. Potential developers should talk with us first to see what can be accommodated.

Natural hazards

High-risk natural hazards proposed as Qualifying Matters include coastal inundation, coastal erosion, and tsunami hazard.

Coastal inundation and erosion hazards have been developed as part of Plan Change 12, set to be notified later in 2023. Coastal hazards specific to urban zones have been included as part of this plan change to better control intensification. Any residential development within these hazard areas needs resource consent, with strong controls to avoid any subdivision.

The latest tsunami hazard information from NIWA has also been included as a qualifying matter, reflecting expected sea-level rise over the next 100 years. Development within tsunami hazard areas is proposed to be restricted to only a suburban density of one two-storey dwelling per site.

Full extent of 1:500-year tsunami hazard with 1.06-metre sea-level rise applied.

Heritage buildings and items and Residential Heritage Areas

We’re proposing 11 new Residential Heritage Areas (RHAs). These neighbourhood areas have buildings and features that are collectively (rather than individually) significant to the city’s heritage and identity, that we want to retain for their coherent history. Our proposal also introduces a buffer for Residential Heritage Areas that have a high-density border, to better protect their edges.

We also propose adding 44 heritage buildings or items and 26 building interiors to be protected under the District Plan. As with existing scheduled buildings and items, these will require a resource consent for significant changes such as building alterations, relocation, or demolition.

Both Residential Heritage Areas and additional buildings and items being added to the schedule for protection are proposed Qualifying Matters. For more information, please see the Heritage Plan Change (Plan Change 13).

Residential Character Areas

Residential Character Areas are identified in the District Plan by Character Area Overlay - residential neighbourhoods that are distinctive from their wider surroundings that we want to retain for their coherent character.

Proposed as Qualifying Matters, there are currently 15 Character Areas in Christchurch City. They were last reviewed in 2015 on the basis that at least 80 per cent of the properties in the area contributed to the character values that made it special.

We propose removing two of the character area overlays in Sumner (Clifton and Esplanade Character Areas), as they no longer meet the criteria. We also propose that seven reduce in size, six remain the same, and Lyttelton’s Character Area increases in size.

Following early feedback on our draft Housing and Business Choice Plan Change in April 2022, three new Character Areas are proposed in:

• Roker Street (Spreydon)
• Ryan Street (Linwood)
• Bewdley Street and Evesham Crescent (Barrington)

Currently, changes to a property within a suburban Character Area usually need a resource consent to assess alterations that may affect the character of the property or the wider character area. We must grant the consent, but it can be subject to design conditions via a controlled activity consent.

In recognition of the status of a Qualifying Matter, we propose introducing a resource consent requirement as a restricted discretionary activity, to help us better protect Character Areas. While some infill development will be allowed, we will have more ability to decline a resource consent where the design of a new house, or changes to an existing house, aren’t in keeping with the Character Area.

Subdivision will also be more restrictive, depending on the zone and area. For example, within a certain Character Area an additional house may be allowed on an existing site, or to the rear on a new site, but it may be limited to between five and eight metres (one or two storeys, depending on building design). It may require a larger garden and existing trees to be retained, with the house or houses set further back from the street and other boundaries than would be allowed for in a general suburban area.

Rules for the Character Areas will differ depending on the character values of each area, as well as the District Plan zone in which the character area is located. The character values that are already being used to assess any development designs submitted to us are proposed to remain the same.

Trees

We know trees are important to our residents. They help tackle climate change, reinforce our identity as the Garden City, provide shade and a range of other environmental, economic, cultural and social benefits.

We’re working on ways – both through this plan change and in other non-regulatory ways – to ensure that green spaces and tree canopy can be retained as much as possible, while enabling more housing choice for our residents.

As part of this plan change, we propose Financial Contributions be required where trees are not retained or planted – to help fund increasing our tree canopy cover in the city (please see the section on Financial Contributions).

Additionally, we propose that the Schedule of Significant and Other Trees, currently included in the District Plan, becomes a Qualifying Matter. We’ve reviewed the existing trees on the list to provide the necessary evidence required under the NPS-UD to be considered as a Qualifying Matter.

A further review of the Schedule of Significant Trees to protect additional trees could be completed as part of any subsequent plan changes.

As part of this plan change, we’re proposing to update tree setbacks to better protect individual trees and, in some zones, to incentivize more tree planting than is currently required.

Our Tree Policy outlines how we manage and maintain trees in public open spaces. The Urban Forest Plan(external link) provides a long-term vision and strategy to maximise the health and sustainability of the city’s urban trees and forests. It was open for feedback in February 2023 and closed on 6 March 2023.

Sunlight access

We’re proposing a city-wide Qualifying Matter across all areas where the MDRS would otherwise apply. This Qualifying Matter relates to recession planes – the vertical angle typically applied at the boundary of a site to ensure buildings provide for sunlight access on neighbouring properties.

Recession plane angles are typically designed to take into account the sun approach angle relative to the local environment (such as a site’s latitude or topography). However, the MDRS applies a recession plane at the same angle across all Tier 1 councils (Auckland to Selwyn), regardless of latitude or a site’s orientation to the sun.

The Sunlight Access Qualifying Matter proposes to modify this approach to better reflect Christchurch’ specific latitude and climate. It ensures a more equitable outcome across Tier 1 councils, providing for sunlight access at all levels of a building, increasing sun exposure, whilst better protecting and enhancing property values. A comparison of the MDRS and what we propose is provided in the table below.

In addition to the above, buildings greater than 12 metres in height that are set back seven metres along east-west boundaries, six metres from northern boundaries, and eight metres from southern boundaries, are exempt from recession planes (subject to zone controls).

Under the Act, the MDRS rules have immediate legal effect upon notification, unless a Qualifying Matter applies. Since the Sunlight Access Qualifying Matter would apply to all areas where the MDRS would otherwise be enabled, this means there is no immediate legal effect of the MDRS rules. Instead, the existing District Plan rules will apply, requiring a resource consent.

This applies in the period between when PC14 is publicly notified (17 March 2023) and when the Council makes a determination on the Independent Hearings Panel’s final recommendation on the Plan Change (anticipated in March/April 2024). 

The sun’s angle in Christchurch is different to its angle in Auckland, and the colder climate here means each hour of sunlight has greater benefit. The Sunlight Access Qualifying Matter aims to give Christchurch developments under the MDRS the same amount of sunlight access as Auckland developments.

Residential Heritage Areas (RHAs)

RHAs are neighbourhood areas with buildings and features that are collectively (rather than individually) significant to the city’s heritage and identity, that we want to retain. They have a coherent history which tells us a story about the residential development of Ōtautahi Christchurch.

The proposed RHAs, which are proposed to become Qualifying Matters under the Housing and Business Choice Plan Change (Plan Change 14), are in the following 11 areas:

• Inner City West
• Chester Street East/Dawson Street (Inner City)
• Englefield Avonville (Inner City East)
• Piko/Shand (Riccarton Block State Housing)
• Heaton Street (Merivale)
• Church Property Trustees North St Albans subdivision (St Albans)
• Wayside Avenue ‘Parade of Homes’ (Burnside)
• RNZAF Station Wigram Staff Housing (Wigram)
• Macmillan Avenue (Cashmere)
• Shelley/Forbes streets (Sydenham)
• Lyttelton

The areas themselves, and the rules we’re proposing for these areas, are new to the District Plan. Our proposal also includes introducing a buffer for Residential Heritage Areas, with a high-density border to better protect their edges.

We’re proposing that, within the identified RHAs, resource consent would be needed for new buildings, additions or alterations to buildings, new fences and walls higher than 1.5 metres, and to demolish or relocate those buildings considered most significant (called “defining” or “contributory” buildings). We’ll assess all development proposals on how they affect the heritage values of the area.

We assessed many other areas of Christchurch against the criteria used for identification as an RHA that did not meet the required threshold. In most cases this was because they were not sufficiently intact, for example, there was too much compromise to the historic heritage values of the area because of demolition, housing modification or new development.

Note that the Lyttelton RHA has been reduced in extent since the boundaries suggested last year, to remove some more recently developed areas.

You can view maps(external link) with the specific boundaries for each of these RHAs.

What if you live in both a Heritage and a Character Area?

If you intend to make changes to your property and it is in both a Residential Character Area and a Residential Heritage Area, and need resource consent for both these matters, you only need to make one resource consent application.

Other proposed heritage rule changes

As well as introducing RHAs, we’re proposing some additional changes to the Heritage chapter in the District Plan. Both RHAs and the additional heritage buildings or items in the first bullet point below are Qualifying Matters under PC14, as well as being included in the package of PC13 changes. Some other heritage changes are outside the scope of PC14.

PC13 changes include:

• Adding 44 heritage buildings or items and 26 building interiors to the District Plan’s Schedule of Significant Historic Heritage for protection. These new heritage buildings and items include five buildings near the city centre, some private buildings, Council-owned halls, bridges and cemeteries, and 25 baches at Taylors Mistake. This includes the addition of some new features following early feedback on our Draft Heritage Plan Change. Additions include Carlton Mill Bridge and Hereford Street Bridge, 16 Papanui War Memorial Avenues (trees and plaques), the Tuberculosis hut on the site of the former Cashmere Sanatorium, and the caretaker’s cottage at Woodham Park.
• Correcting and updating mapping and details on the heritage schedule for several heritage buildings/items to accurately show the extent of the area subject to protection. These corrections and updates are being applied for a variety of reasons including to reflect changes to buildings or changes due to the subdivision of the property since it was scheduled.
• Wording changes to some heritage policies and several changes to heritage rules with the strengthening of some rules. The aim is to simplify and clarify provisions, improve workability for users of the District Plan and the Council, and improve heritage outcomes.

If you live in or own a building that we’re proposing to be protected by the District Plan Heritage Schedule, you can make some changes, such as minor repairs and maintenance, without resource consent.

However, resource consent is needed for more significant changes, such as building alterations, relocation, or demolition, and for new buildings in heritage settings. We carefully assess all proposals for development or changes on how they would affect the heritage values of the heritage place.