The inspections identified a number of areas where the banks are unstable and eroding. While slumping and other instabilities have been a feature of the river for a long time, the earthquakes have accelerated this process and caused more widespread instability than would usually be present. A number of areas were identified as high priority, requiring work within the next 5 years to maintain waterway capacity or prevent further bank failure.
Funding has been obtained to address these high priority areas. The work will proceed in two stages. This first stage is currently being consulted on. The second stage are those areas which may be affected by low stop banks if these are selected to manage frequent flooding. As further approval and consultation is required for the low stop banks, work on the second stage will not take place until later in 2018.
Stage 1: What is proposed
The stabilisation works need to ensure that the drainage function of the river is improved (through additional capacity and preventing further slumping), while also ensuring that cultural, recreational, ecological, landscape and heritage values are taken into consideration. Therefore, wherever possible, waterway area has been increased by widening the channel. This enables bank stabilisation through a ‘naturalised’ bank profile (rather than hard engineering structures), and increases the capacity of the river. The work will be in keeping with the Mid Heathcote/Ōpāwaho Linear Park Masterplan, which was approved in 2009.
Different types of bank instability require different methods to address the issue. The different designs to be used along the waterway are described in detail in pages 12 to 20, and these designs are then referenced on each plan. To see what is in your area you will need to refer first to the plan, and then look for the detailed description and cross-section of each design type.
There are a number of common features throughout most
designs:
- Preserving trees where possible
- A key trigger of bank instability is erosion and undercutting of the bank toe. To address this instability, a rock edge is proposed in most places
- Crevasses and undercutting, while being bad for bank stability, provide habitat for aquatic life. To provide a partial replacement of this habitat, small pipes are proposed within the rock edge, along with planting above the rock edge.
- Slumping caused by over steepened banks is generally addressed by cutting back the banks to achieve a stable profile. This increases the waterway area of the river, improving the flow.
- Plantings along the river edge protect the bank to prevent further slumping.
- Where space is constrained then additional stability works are required, either through a second layer of rocks as a low wall, or in a few limited areas by constructing gabions.
In some areas it is proposed to narrow the road and remove some bankside carparks. This allows drainage capacity
to be increased, setting aside space for footpaths and still considering the other community values.